Neuron-Silicon Junction or Brain-Computer Junction?
Peter Fromherz
in:
Ars Electronica Festival. Eds. G. Stocker, C. Schöpf. Springer, Wien 1997, pp.158-161

[fig. 1] Brain-Computer Junction.
[a] Classical mechano-optical pathway eye-screen and finger-keyboard
[b] Imaginary ionic-electrical junction of the computer with optic and motor centers of
the cerebral cortex.
I first observed nerve cells and silicon wafers
while working on two distinctly different degree
dissertations in my laboratory at the University
of Ulm in 1984. At the time, we were studying how
the electrical activity of nerve cells influenced
fluorescent dyesand the effects of artificial
membrane layers on microscopic silicon electrodes.
Enthused by the results, I used the occasion
of the 20th Winter Seminar "Molecules, Information
and Memory" presented by Manfred Eigen in January
1985 to present a paper entitled Brain on Line? The
Feasibility of a Neuron-Silicon Junction,
in which I outlined how a direct eletrical contact
between a nerve cell and silicon (and vice versa)
could be constructed. In The paper, i wrote:
"The information processing of the networks of neurons in a brain and of the networks of
silicon chips in a computer is coupled at the present
moment macroscopically through the opto-mechanical pathway eye-screen and finger-keyboard [fig. a].
Is a direct microscopical coupling feasible [fig.
b]?
The utopian question may be shaped into a proper
scientific problem: How to design a neuron-silicon
junction?"
The matter did not remain at the design
stage. However, a prerequisite for carrying
out a neuron-silicon junction was the process
of learning and mastering the production of
silicon chips and the cultivation of nerve cells -
by a small team working in one and the same
laboratory.
Six years later, we published a description
of the first direct electrical junction of
a nerve cell to a silicon transistor;
1o years later,
the first direct electrical junction of a silicon
microstructure to a nerve cell.
Since then, we have performed a detailed
study of the physics of the coupling of neurons
and silicon. We understand how the
quality of the signal transmission is effected by
the geometry of the cell-chip contact and by
the electrical properties of the cell membrane
and of silicon.
All of these studies were carried out using
large nerve cells (approximately 6o micrometers
in diameter) of leech ganglia.
As an
example, Fig. 2 illustrates the "wiring up" of such
a nerve cell with the 16 transistors of a silicon
chip. The first junctions with nerve cells from
the brain of a rat have recently been success-
fully performed. Here, the small size of these
cells (about 1o micrometers) poses particular
problems.

[fig. 2] Neuron-Silicon Junction. Nerve cell
(approximately 60 micrometers in diameter) of a leech
ganglion in direct contact with 16 transistors in
silicon. Eletcrical voltage impulses in the cell
directly effect the chip's electronics.
These lengthy and difficult experiments
have shown us just how large a gap really
exists between test-tube experiments involving
a neuron-silicon junction and the interfacing
of the brain and the computer. We must
keep in mind that we are dealing with two completely
different aspects here - a physical one
and an informational one.
To begin with: the physics of the direct junction
of nerve cells and silicon is based on the
contact of the neurons' thin (5 nanometer) cell
membrane with the thin (2o nanometer) layer
of quartz which makes up the silicon's watertight
casing.
Only when the contact is extremely
close (about 3o nanometers) does an electrical
coupling take place through the electrical
field (electrostatic induction). This tight junction
can be successfully created in the testtube
with clean silicon chips and nerve cells
which have been dissected from tissue samples.
The form which such a contact would take
in the tissue of a nerve fiber or of the brain cannot
be foreseen at the moment. After all, this is
not merely a matter of maintaining a few random
contacts; if the brain and the computer -
two separate worlds miniaturized down to
microscopic level - are really to be brought into
connection with one another, and if an adequate
level of communication is to come about
as a result, then millions of contacts must be
set up.
Moreover: it is not sufficient to install contacts
between the brain and the computer
which exchange some sort of informational bits
in both directions. Both the brain and the computer
must directly understand the semantics
of a foreign language without the abstraction
and adaptation accomplished by means of keyboard
and monitor. Both operating systems
have to communicate directly with each other
in a meaningful way.
As long as we do not know
how the brain functions - what relationship
exists between its microscopic electrical signals
and its macroscopic semantics - an informational
interface remains impossible even if the
physical junction were feasible.
What can be done? Physicists will carry on
with the effort to establish thousands of
contact points between nerve cells and silicon
microstructures. Experiments to achieve this -
in cooperation with major firms in the microelectronics
industry - are now underway. Even
if this can only be done in a test-tube, it will provide
scientists with a basis for understanding
how larger hybrid networks composed of neuronal
and technological elements communicate
with each other on the level of semantic
information. Thus, we might learn something
about the function of the brain.
Setting up contacts within living tissue is
another problem. One solution might be an
ingenious form of coating of the chip or the cell.
Here as well, it will be necessary to first carry
out basic research on the biology, chemistry and
physics of cell adhesion.
The process of achieving a direct junction of
individual nerve cells and individual silicon
microstructures has opened our eyes to the
difficulty of establishing a linkage between the
brain and the computer without the mediation
of the opto-mechanical pathway eye-screen
and finger-keyboard.
The apparent problems
posed by this junction on the physical and informational
levels are so enormous that it is impossible
today to predict whether such a form of
communication will ever become a reality. For
this reason, an ethical consideration of issues
such as "chip in the brain" or "brain in the computer"
would be unfounded and superfluous.
Publications:
A Neuron-Silicon-Junction: A Retzius-Cell of the Leech on an Insulated-Gate
Field-Effect Transistor.
P.Fromherz, A.Offenhäusser, T.Vetter, J.Weis, Science 252 (1991) 1290-1293
A Silicon-Neuron Junction: Capacitive Stimulation of an Individual Neuron
on a Silicon Chip.
P. Fromherz, A. Stett, Phys.Rev.Lett. 75 (1995) 1670-1673
Neuron-Transistor: Electrical Transfer Function measured by the Patch-Clamp Technique.
P.Fromherz, C.O.Müller, R.Weis, Phys.Rev.Lett. 71 (1993) 4079-4082
Neuron Adhesion on Silicon Chip probed by an Array of Field-Effect Transistors.
R. Weis, B. Müller, P. Fromherz, Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 327-330
Frequency Dependent Signal-Transfer in Neuron-Transistors.
R. Weis, P. Fromherz, Phys.Rev.E 55 (1997) 877-889
Two-Way Silicon-Neuron Interface by Electrical Induction.
A. Stett, B. Müller, P. Fromherz, Phys.Rev.E 55 (1997) 1779-1782
Neurons from Rat Brain coupled to Transistors.
S. Vassanelli, P. Fromherz, Appl.Physics A, 65 (1997) 85-88